Introduction – Why SAP Compliance Risk Is Increasing
SAP license compliance has quietly become a high-stakes enterprise risk. As SAP shifts customers toward its cloud offerings (like RISE with SAP), the company is increasingly using audits and compliance enforcement as a revenue engine.
These audits are not random check-ins. They are often timed strategically around contract renewals, expansions, or migrations when SAP has maximum leverage.
The result? Organizations caught off guard by an audit can face massive unbudgeted costs, legal disputes, and operational disruption.
Senior executives should treat SAP license compliance as a serious financial control issue, not just a technical formality.
Non-compliance isn’t a minor paperwork mistake – it can unleash multi-million-euro penalties, erode negotiation leverage, and even become a public legal battle.
In an era of tight IT budgets and fragile reputations, ensuring SAP compliance year-round is as critical as managing cybersecurity or financial audits.
Audit Penalties – How SAP Calculates Non-Compliance Costs
SAP’s audit penalties are designed to sting. When an audit finds unlicensed usage, SAP will charge the full list price for every unlicensed user or product – no discounts, no mercy.
On top of that, SAP typically adds retroactive maintenance fees of around 22% per year, often backdated 2–4 years to cover the period of unlicensed use.
In extreme cases, SAP may tack on interest or a penalty uplift for the late discovery of compliance issues. A small license gap can quickly snowball into a seven-figure invoice under this formula.
Example: A global manufacturer faced a €3.8 million penalty after an audit uncovered indirect SAP access via a third-party portal. SAP billed the full list price for each unlicensed connection and added two years of backdated maintenance fees, creating a shocking true-up demand.
Mitigation:
- Run internal license audits (using SAP’s USMM and LAW tools) at least twice per year to catch issues early.
- Review all third-party systems and interfaces for indirect access to SAP data – ensure they are properly licensed or technically restricted.
- Maintain a detailed inventory of your SAP entitlements and actual usage metrics to spot any activity beyond what you purchased.
Checklist:
- Identify all systems (portals, apps, interfaces) connected to SAP.
- Validate that each user’s activity matches their assigned license type.
- Reconcile internal usage logs with contract entitlements to detect any overuse before SAP does.
Unbudgeted Costs – How Audit Findings Disrupt IT and Finance
Unplanned SAP audit findings tend to strike at the worst times – often right before a renewal or during annual budget planning. A single audit can suddenly expose multi-million-euro compliance gaps, leaving CIOs and CFOs scrambling to cover an unbudgeted bill.
With minimal leverage to negotiate, companies often must immediately purchase licenses to “correct” the shortfall, diverting funds from other priorities. Major IT projects may be frozen or canceled as their budgets get reallocated to pay the true-up.
Example: A financial services firm discovered €1.2 million in unlicensed SAP engine usage during an audit. SAP refused to renew the company’s contracts until those licenses were bought on the spot, forcing the firm to pull from other project budgets to stay operational.
Mitigation:
- Build a compliance risk reserve into the IT budget each year – a safety net for unexpected true-up costs.
- Conduct periodic “shadow audits” with internal teams or third-party experts to identify compliance issues on your terms, not SAP’s.
- Retire or clean up unused SAP systems and user accounts before audits; a smaller footprint lowers risk.
Checklist:
- Add an audit contingency line in the IT budget.
- Perform quarterly license vs. usage reconciliations to catch overuse early.
- Monitor usage against contract limits and act before thresholds are breached.
Legal Exposure – When SAP Takes Customers to Court
Most SAP compliance disputes end in negotiations, but not all.
In rare cases, SAP has taken customers to court over license violations.
The legal stakes are enormous: SAP can sue for breach of contract and demand full list-price fees for unlicensed use. A public lawsuit not only threatens crippling costs but also drags a company’s name into the spotlight.
The Diageo precedent in the UK is a warning sign. In that case, SAP sued Diageo for allowing Salesforce users to indirectly access SAP data without proper licenses.
The High Court ruled in SAP’s favor, confirming that even indirect use required SAP licenses. This landmark victory emboldened SAP to enforce compliance more aggressively across its customer base.
Mitigation:
- Define indirect use clearly in your SAP contracts. Don’t rely on vague terms – explicitly state what third-party interactions are permitted without extra licensing.
- Technically and contractually segregate non-SAP integrations. Ensure data flows through middleware or APIs are documented and covered by appropriate licenses or terms.
- Involve legal counsel at the first sign of an audit dispute. Don’t wait for a lawsuit threat – have legal review audit claims and your contract rights early in the process.
Checklist:
- Review SAP agreements for indirect access clauses or ambiguities, and address gaps in the next negotiation.
- Maintain documentation on all third-party systems interfacing with SAP (who uses what data, and how).
- Establish an internal escalation plan that brings in legal and executives as soon as an audit turns contentious.
Operational Risks – Impact on Projects and Support
License non-compliance can jeopardize business operations. SAP might suspend technical support or software updates for systems under audit dispute, putting daily operations at risk.
Unresolved compliance issues can also block routine renewals or expansion of your SAP environment, and projects can derail – an upgrade could stall if SAP withholds license keys or maintenance. Sometimes SAP may even pressure you to adopt its cloud offerings as a “solution” to the compliance problem.
Example: A logistics company’s SAP S/4HANA upgrade was thrown off course when SAP declined to extend support during an audit dispute. The project sat in limbo until the company addressed the compliance issues under SAP’s terms, causing a critical delay.
Mitigation:
- Keep audit negotiations separate from day-to-day support discussions. Ring-fence compliance issues so SAP can’t tie them to other projects or contracts.
- Document all support entitlements and payments. If SAP threatens to withhold support, you’ll need proof you’ve paid for maintenance and have rights to assistance.
- Develop contingency plans for key initiatives. For example, have a backup plan if an SAP upgrade is delayed or if you temporarily lose vendor support.
Checklist:
- Track support end-dates and renew critical support well before expiration (to avoid leverage during audits).
- Keep a log of all communications with SAP about audits or support, so nothing is missed in negotiations.
- For major SAP-dependent projects, identify dependencies (license keys, support packs) and plan how to proceed if SAP’s help is unavailable.
Over-Licensing Risk – The Hidden Opposite of Non-Compliance
Over-licensing is the expensive flipside of non-compliance. Many companies overspend by 20–40% on SAP licenses, buying far more than they need out of audit fear or poor visibility.
This leaves a trove of shelfware – licenses sitting unused while still incurring annual maintenance fees with no return on investment.
Why does it happen? Sometimes teams overestimate needs or buy extra “just in case” without concrete data.
This habit creates a false sense of safety while quietly draining the budget. It can also hurt future negotiations, since SAP sees a pattern of over-buying rather than optimizing what you have.
Mitigation:
- Perform an annual rightsizing review of SAP usage. Identify licenses or modules that aren’t fully utilized and could be trimmed or downgraded.
- Use role-based analysis to identify over-provisioned users. If many users have Professional licenses but only a few truly need that level, adjust the rest to cheaper types.
- Work with SAP or third-party advisors to reallocate shelfware. In some cases, you may negotiate credit for unused licenses or drop them from maintenance to save costs.
Checklist:
- Hold a yearly license optimization workshop to eliminate or repurpose unused licenses.
- Pinpoint shelfware and plan to eliminate, reallocate, or seek credits for it.
- After major company changes, re-evaluate SAP user assignments to ensure license counts align with actual usage.
Incident Response – What to Do if You Discover Non-Compliance
The moment a compliance gap is discovered, your first moves are crucial.
The key is to act strategically – not reactively – so you maintain control of the situation.
Immediate Steps:
- Contain – Immediately stop or isolate any unlicensed usage to prevent further breach.
- Assess – Gather internal data to quantify the scope (which systems, users, and the duration of the unlicensed use).
- Escalate – Alert senior leadership and involve legal/procurement teams to prepare a coordinated response plan.
- Strategize – Decide on your approach before SAP intervenes: can you quietly remediate the issue, or should you disclose it and negotiate a settlement?
- Engage experts – Consult independent SAP licensing experts for a second opinion and negotiation guidance before SAP dictates the narrative.
Example: A pharmaceutical company discovered a CRM system was feeding data into SAP without proper licensing.
By calculating the true exposure internally before engaging SAP, they reduced SAP’s claim from €2.5 million to around €600K with a phased licensing agreement. That proactive approach saved them millions.
Incident Checklist:
- Identify the full scope of affected systems and users.
- Secure logs and evidence to document how long the unlicensed use occurred.
- Calculate an internal estimate of the license shortfall (volume and cost) as a baseline.
- Consult licensing experts or legal counsel before responding to SAP, and craft a data-driven strategy.
Preventive Governance – How to Stay Audit-Ready Year-Round
The best way to handle SAP audit risk is to never be caught off guard.
That means baking compliance into IT governance as an ongoing discipline. Audit readiness should be a continuous state, not a frantic scramble when the audit notice arrives.
- Regular internal audits – Schedule internal SAP license audits at least biannually to catch issues early (a “fire drill” for the real thing).
- Centralized records – Keep all SAP contracts and license entitlements in one repository. Knowing exactly what you own makes it easier to spot any usage outside your rights.
- SAP governance committee – Set up a cross-functional team (IT, Procurement, Finance, Legal) to jointly oversee SAP usage and compliance. Shared oversight means more eyes on potential risks and fewer surprises.
- Compliance KPIs – Include SAP compliance in team KPIs or performance goals. When teams are measured on avoiding license gaps, they stay vigilant year-round.
Over time, these practices make audit readiness business-as-usual – greatly reducing the odds of a multimillion-euro surprise from SAP.
Checklist:
- Schedule recurring internal SAP license audits (e.g., every 6 months).
- Use tools to track license entitlements and usage in near real-time, so you always know your compliance status.
- Include SAP compliance status in quarterly reports to keep executives aware and supportive.
Related articles
- SAP Audit Penalties Explained: How Non-Compliance Can Cost Millions
- Under-Licensing vs Over-Licensing Risks: The Hidden Costs of Getting SAP Licensing Wrong
- Indirect Access Risk Scenarios in SAP: What Triggers Charges & What You Can Do
- Cost of Non-Compliance vs Compliance: Why Investing in SAP License Governance Pays Off
- Avoiding Common SAP Compliance Mistakes: Everyday Errors That Lead to Audits and How to Prevent Them
5 SAP Compliance Safeguards to Remember
- Audit your SAP estate before SAP does. Regular self-audits are the best defense to catch and fix issues on your terms.
- Track integrations to prevent indirect access exposure. Know every system touching SAP – and ensure it’s properly licensed or isolated to avoid surprise indirect use fees.
- Separate audit issues from renewals and projects. Don’t let SAP use a compliance finding as leverage in contract negotiations or to stall key initiatives.
- Maintain complete records of contracts and usage rights. You can’t defend your position if you don’t know your entitlements, so keep comprehensive records.
- Engage experts early – bring in independent advisors before SAP dictates the terms.
Read about our SAP Advisory Services
